| Return to iWEBTOOL |
| |
|
| |||||||
 | Welcome to iWEBTOOL Talk, where you talk about
webmaster-related stuff.
1 Register
2 Browse the board
3 Discuss whatever may interest you! | |||||||||||||
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
02-01-2006, 06:50 PM
| #1 |
| Newcomer  Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2
 |  XHTML vs. TABLES is XHTML really better for a good page ranking than tables? ans what about CSS?
__________________ Hans-Werner http://www.tollernet.de http://jubis.tollernet.de http://trischa.tollernet.de |
|
|
| |||||||
|
02-01-2006, 10:19 PM
| #2 |
| Registered Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,543
 | Re: XHTML vs. TABLES I'm not no expert on XHTML nor CSS but i don't think the style should matter, as long as the Google/MSN/Yahoo bot can read whatever is shown.
__________________ Wanna thank someone? Give 'em a rep. More info. |
|
|
|
02-03-2006, 11:08 PM
| #3 |
| Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Melbourne, AU
Posts: 41
| Re: XHTML vs. TABLES Hi Hans, XHTML is not something that can be compared with tables, because tables can be used in XHTML and HTML, and with or without CSS. If you would like to ask your question in a more specific manner, I should be able to help you with a solution to what ever problem you may be facing  MrLeN
__________________ News and Entertainment |
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 08:46 AM
| #4 |
| Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 132
| Re: XHTML vs. TABLES I suppose you meant <div> and CSS rather than <table>. It is a common practice nowadays for xHTML validation...
__________________ Eat healthy, Stay Fit, Die Anyway. --==-- If there is a man who knows everything about women, there is a Windows distribution without bugs. |
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 01:09 AM
| #5 |
| Smurf Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 41
| Re: XHTML vs. TABLES Yea, like already mentioned XHTML cannot be compared with tables. You most likely meant <div> in comparison to <table>. While designing, XHTML CSS combination would be best. CSS stands for Cascading Style Sheet. Basically what CSS is used for is placement of objects (usually along with XHTML), styling of text, and pulling of cool little features such as rollovers. The use of DIV and CSS eliminates all those empty rows and columns people used to use for placement of objects on pages. Though CSS can help substantially cut loading times, I can't say that using it will help your rankings in any way. I'm pretty sure spiders don't analyze code for validation, or cleanliness.
__________________ Puerto Vallarta Tours |
|
|
|
02-07-2006, 01:49 AM
| #6 |
| Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Melbourne, AU
Posts: 41
| Re: XHTML vs. TABLES Well said Louis11 MrLeN
__________________ News and Entertainment |
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 03:34 AM
| #7 |
| Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Australia
Posts: 41
| Re: XHTML vs. TABLES search engines are actually very forgiving in terms of your code. xhtml just to ensure that your site is read correctly. |
|
|
| (Threads which have no activity for more than 30 days are automatically closed.) |
| Quick Reply | ||
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HTML and Tables | King Gareth | HTML | 17 | 12-27-2006 11:35 PM |
| XHTML Brief-up please...!!! | Ash_007 | Web Development | 2 | 10-24-2006 04:14 PM |
| page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional | lite_ws | Tools & Software | 1 | 10-16-2006 06:50 AM |
| XHTML Validation | compuXP | Advertise your website | 1 | 06-16-2006 06:34 PM |
Linear Mode
