The Un-offical PR prediction fun thread

temi · 10-28-2007, 11:14 AM

Chat Music,
What do you base the quality ratings on, the general look and fell + contents of the site?
Thanks

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chart Music

Quality rating: 6 out of ten
Traffic rating.: 2 out of ten

Chart Music · 10-28-2007, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by temi

Chat Music,
What do you base the quality ratings on, the general look and fell + contents of the site?
Thanks

There is a post on the first page with some info. Basically anything that is useful looking at it from a search engine or user point of view. Forums are difficult things but it's pretty good.

temi · 10-28-2007, 11:41 AM

Thanks for that explanation, I will have a quick read on the first page.

temi · 10-28-2007, 11:47 AM

Chart Music,
I think its a fun project, rep added. Now, care to have a look at my directory script site not bothered about the PR think but suggestion on how users may find it is welcomed.

Bagi once reviewed it and thought is so Good that it should win UK WW site of the month, I did not believe Bagi because he is my friends, friends tends to wear rose tinted spectacles when reviewing their friends site. I look forward to an objective review from you

Bagi Zoltán · 10-28-2007, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by temi

friends tends to wear rose tinted spectacles when reviewing their friends site

Temi, it is not true. My review was as least as hard as the graphite

temi · 10-28-2007, 11:58 AM

Thanks for that Bagi, I will compare you review with Chart Music review, I know different reviewers have different criterias but lets wait and see

Anders Moen · 10-28-2007, 12:09 PM

andersmoen.com: PR 3. Predirected: PR: 4
templatesheaven.net: PR 1. Predirected: Insufficient backlinks

andersmoen.com was predicted to be PR 3 (and it was PR 0), and guess what! It turned out to be 3 as well. Hopefully I'll go up to PR 4 (or more)

Chart Music · 10-28-2007, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by temi

Chart Music,
I think its a fun project, rep added. Now, care to have a look at my directory script site not bothered about the PR think but suggestion on how users may find it is welcomed.

Bagi once reviewed it and thought is so Good that it should win UK WW site of the month, I did not believe Bagi because he is my friends, friends tends to wear rose tinted spectacles when reviewing their friends site. I look forward to an objective review from you

http://www.linkbidscript.com
Quality rating: 7 out of ten
Traffic rating.: 3 out of ten

Site same with and without www, ideally should only be one, and at very least tell Google in webmasters tools which one it is to use.
Add a robots.txt file and list your sitemap.xml, if you don't have one create it - many free tools available for this.
Many different fonts/or sizes makes page not nice to read.

temi · 10-28-2007, 03:02 PM

Thanks very much for taking the time to do the review, will impliment your suggestions, especially the one about having one url for the url with or without www.

Sticky · 10-28-2007, 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chart Music

www.linkterritory.com

PR prediction: 3
Quality rating: 8 out of ten
Traffic rating.: 1 out of ten

Well you were close, but no cigar.....

CBO · 10-29-2007, 04:16 AM

Please do my site, too!
http://www.computerbooksonline.com

And a question - I see that the PR update is happening, but my site has not changed (yet?). Is this something that takes Google several days to complete?

Chart Music · 10-29-2007, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sticky

Well you were close, but no cigar.....

Congratulations on your PR4

Chart Music · 10-29-2007, 12:52 PM

http://www.computerbooksonline.com

It's a PR4 now after the update, I doubt if Google will update again for a while...but you never know.

PR prediction: 4
Quality rating: 6 out of ten
Traffic rating.: 1 out of ten

The quality would be 8 as many things really good, but one large question mark hangs over it's crawability for all search engines. This site has HTML errors (not just warnings which are normal) http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...line &group=0
I think the problem maybe because the page is inside a frame, which itself is not a good thing and makes me think it may not be crawable, as least not for less forgiving search engine crawlers.
Recommend removing the frame if you can. You can download Firefox and use the HTML validator add-on.http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/ and that will show you more.

Same issue with www and none www pages being show the same as made to another site a few posts back.

Sticky · 10-29-2007, 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chart Music

Congratulations on your PR4

Thank you, and thanks for your prediction.

CBO · 10-30-2007, 01:39 AM

Thanks for doing my site. I'm checking with w3 now, and will download the Firefox addon next.

The pages aren't really in a frame, they use includes for the top, left, and bottom panels. So no problem like a frame within a frame. But maybe it does cause problems for crawlers.

Bummer on the PR 4 - it used to be a 6, and the IWT predicted a 5. Oh well, maybe next time....

Thanks again

10-28-2007, 11:41 AM	#48
temi Junior Guru Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Europe>UK>England Posts: 578	Re: The Un-offical PR prediction fun thread Thanks for that explanation, I will have a quick read on the first page. __________________ Golf Equipment Shop::Webmaster Forum::UK Web Hosting

10-28-2007, 11:47 AM	#49
temi Junior Guru Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Europe>UK>England Posts: 578	Re: The Un-offical PR prediction fun thread Chart Music, I think its a fun project, rep added. Now, care to have a look at my directory script site not bothered about the PR think but suggestion on how users may find it is welcomed. Bagi once reviewed it and thought is so Good that it should win UK WW site of the month, I did not believe Bagi because he is my friends, friends tends to wear rose tinted spectacles when reviewing their friends site. I look forward to an objective review from you __________________ Golf Equipment Shop::Webmaster Forum::UK Web Hosting

10-28-2007, 11:58 AM	#51
temi Junior Guru Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Europe>UK>England Posts: 578	Re: The Un-offical PR prediction fun thread Thanks for that Bagi, I will compare you review with Chart Music review, I know different reviewers have different criterias but lets wait and see __________________ Golf Equipment Shop::Webmaster Forum::UK Web Hosting

10-28-2007, 12:09 PM	#52
Anders Moen Newcomer Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 9	Re: The Un-offical PR prediction fun thread andersmoen.com: PR 3. Predirected: PR: 4 templatesheaven.net: PR 1. Predirected: Insufficient backlinks andersmoen.com was predicted to be PR 3 (and it was PR 0), and guess what! It turned out to be 3 as well. Hopefully I'll go up to PR 4 (or more) __________________ Regards, http://www.andersmoen.com

10-28-2007, 03:02 PM	#54
temi Junior Guru Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Europe>UK>England Posts: 578	Re: The Un-offical PR prediction fun thread Thanks very much for taking the time to do the review, will impliment your suggestions, especially the one about having one url for the url with or without www. __________________ Golf Equipment Shop::Webmaster Forum::UK Web Hosting

10-29-2007, 04:16 AM	#56
CBO Newcomer Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 3	Re: The Un-offical PR prediction fun thread Please do my site, too! http://www.computerbooksonline.com And a question - I see that the PR update is happening, but my site has not changed (yet?). Is this something that takes Google several days to complete? __________________ http://www.computerbooksonline.com

10-29-2007, 12:52 PM	#58
Chart Music iWEBTOOL SEO Advisor Contributor Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 1,269	Re: The Un-offical PR prediction fun thread http://www.computerbooksonline.com It's a PR4 now after the update, I doubt if Google will update again for a while...but you never know. PR prediction: 4 Quality rating: 6 out of ten Traffic rating.: 1 out of ten The quality would be 8 as many things really good, but one large question mark hangs over it's crawability for all search engines. This site has HTML errors (not just warnings which are normal) http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...line &group=0 I think the problem maybe because the page is inside a frame, which itself is not a good thing and makes me think it may not be crawable, as least not for less forgiving search engine crawlers. Recommend removing the frame if you can. You can download Firefox and use the HTML validator add-on.http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/ and that will show you more. Same issue with www and none www pages being show the same as made to another site a few posts back. __________________ Eco Tours \| SWC \| Abundance and Prosperity See a good post? <--Give thanks by clicking left of post.

10-30-2007, 01:39 AM	#60
CBO Newcomer Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 3	Re: The Un-offical PR prediction fun thread Thanks for doing my site. I'm checking with w3 now, and will download the Firefox addon next. The pages aren't really in a frame, they use includes for the top, left, and bottom panels. So no problem like a frame within a frame. But maybe it does cause problems for crawlers. Bummer on the PR 4 - it used to be a 6, and the IWT predicted a 5. Oh well, maybe next time.... Thanks again __________________ http://www.computerbooksonline.com

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Know me-Know Fun....No me No Fun	reetesh	Introduce yourself	4	07-02-2007 06:25 AM
Cat fun	Chart Music	Media	9	06-12-2007 07:44 PM
The Official "PR Prediction Tool Accuracy" Thread	jumpenjuhosaphat	Google	21	04-30-2007 09:27 AM
eMauj.com...just fun	Scorpi1in	Advertise your website	0	08-07-2006 04:57 PM
Have Fun with RSS	ciancomp	Advertise your website	1	05-28-2006 10:14 AM