submitceo

It appears that most of your incoming links are from places such as website directories. Not very valuable incoming links.
You need more content rich linking from articles and subject related websites.
It is a lot of work but pays off.
Your overall goal is to appear to be the "AUTHORITY" that everyone links to.
That is the idiots version of search engine algo's.
Everyone wants to quote the leading authority on a subject. (keyword)

rnikolov

I see only a constant update of the backward links (usually decrease of the number) at the Google Toolbar.

__________________
DrugInfo: http://www.drugsrnikolov.com/
Top Generic Drugs: http://www.top-generic-drugs.com/

mars guitars

I'm still waiting (yawn). But my Google results are improving for chosen search terms, so I'm not bovvered.

__________________
Guitar strings and accessories, Rotosound bass strings, Guitar Capos and Guitar Gifts from Mars Guitars UK
. . . .under development.. guitar string guide

roksolana

How do check them?

__________________
roksolana-dating.com
aMariner.net

submitceo

Yawn...............

wwe9112

I can't even get indexed for what ever reason I have Meta tags and such.

submitceo

Get 5 - 10 QUALITY links out there and they will find you.
Don't make the mistake of feeling as though you have to push yourself on them.
ie: submitting your site over and over and over and over and over and over and over.......................
TELLING people you're great has little weight.
OTHER PEOPLE telling them you're great means a lot.
Get it?

rnikolov

I speak about the links that appear at the Google ToolBar as backward links. The links shown at the Google Webmaster Central are also contrantly updated.

__________________
DrugInfo: http://www.drugsrnikolov.com/
Top Generic Drugs: http://www.top-generic-drugs.com/

fellowknowbest

Today's top SEO tip , don't worry about PageRank. I've abandoned the pursuit of PR. Worry about content !

__________________
My Sites :J1 tax back / Jobs in Ireland /

submitceo

Thought I would post this article from webPro news.

It came out today October 25th. Thought some might enjoy.

As we covered yesterday, two dozen prominent online marketing blogs and mainstream news sites like the WashingtonPost and Forbes.com saw their toolbar PageRank drop between two and four places.

The only commonality among the sites appeared to be that they either sold links or were part of a network of sites with internal linking structures. The immediate response was fear that traffic would plummet. However, as noted by many traffic remained the same, or in at least one case, increased.

Barry Scwartz at SERoundtable saw a two percent increase in traffic following a 3-point PageRank drop, from PR 7 to PR 4. The lack of real impact has produced the theory that the PR hit was more of a Google head fake. If the search engine company meant business, these sites would have dropped in the organic search results or would have been delisted altogether.

Following that train of thought away from conspiracy theories that Google was penalizing sites and blogs that are often critical of company, Schwartz comes up with quite the level-headed conclusion:

If Google delisted all of those sites, then that would hurt their relevancy on some queries. With Google, they want to deliver the best possible results. How can they do that and also send a message to link sellers and link buyers? The safest method is to take this route and lower their PageRank. Link buyers, although not recommended, look at PageRank as a measurement for buying links. Google lowering the PageRank of some of these sites should make it harder for some of those sites to sell links.

Robert Scoble has his own, somewhat less controversial theory, from a post entitled "Google PageRank is Dead and Has Been For Some Time":

[b]loggers were showing up too high in searches anyway. In comparing to my friends we got lots of traffic from Google that we didn’t deserve. The problem is that traffic isn’t good anyway. Put it this way, let’s say I showed up high in a search for Saturn Cars (since I’ve written about them). Most people wouldn’t have found much value in that post and even if they did they wouldn’t have stuck around to be a regular reader.

So whether the PageRank update was a message or a relevancy tweak remains a bit of mystery, but these two theories are as good as any

Alan

Thanks for informing us submitceo. I came across a an article in a similar vein;
http://searchengineland.com/071007-173841.php

__________________

ahb Solutions Consultancy and Web Development

Seen a good post - Give some reputation click on the

dochost

Thanks for informative post, submitceo ..

Martin81Vette

My PR has just increased from 2 to 3, I've been working really hard at getting inbound links mainly through blog posts and forum posts but a little through article writing as well.

I'm fairly pleased with a 1 point increase but was hoping for more.

__________________
The Day Lily Cottage
daylilycottage.com::lesswired.com

Jerlene

All my sites have been updated. The algorithm has changed though.

__________________
Webmaster Forum & Marketplace

Artvision

Noticed the same yesterday. Few websites dropped to PR2,3, few without any change, and just a limited number of websites got better ranking.

Looks like you're right

__________________
http://www.affiliatesnetwork.info/links/