|
| |||||||
![]() | Welcome to iWEBTOOL Talk, where you talk about
webmaster-related stuff.
1 Register
2 Browse the board
3 Discuss whatever may interest you! | |||||||||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Newcomer Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1
![]() | I have benn using the BL checker regularly for a few weeks now, but I have never had such a weird result: When I check the domain http://www.dsl.pl for BL I get a whole list of pages with PR 10, which in fact should be 0 or 1. In fact there are non-actual links to an ecommerce site and definitely no pr hi-jacking involved. Google should not show any results from cgibin, robots.txt is User-agent: * Disallow: /cgibin Has anybody seen something like this or an explanation? Last edited 02-14-2006 at 08:27 AM. |
| |
|
| |||||||
| | #2 |
| Member Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 53
![]() | I have had this before and i posted comments on Dp, and they helped me. Said i had to write it out again...! ![]() |
| |
| | #3 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Michigan
Posts: 87
![]() | I think the Next Google Update is Occurring right now. Early today MrGoodhost.com had a PR 0, later I checked and it has a PR 3. It's been in the Google Sandbox because it's new. Not too bad for a first PR. And another domain called Gamejig.com didn't have a PR either, and is now PR 4. It was also in the Google Sandbox for being new. Forgot to add a comment - the IWebTool showed a PR Prediction of 5 for both sites. Last edited 02-18-2006 at 11:16 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
| |
| | #4 |
| Junior Member | I think that therez been a mistake here bith of your websites have a PR 0. Plz recheck and stop misleading ppl
__________________ max pain make money online :p Make money before getting too old. outsourcing projects The best outsourcing website |
| |
| | #5 | |
| wo0h0o | Quote:
The result ar STRAIGHT from google, I think this is the predicted PR and not the actuall PR, they seem to be some what off though. | |
| |
| | #6 |
| Newcomer Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3
![]() | TheOmnicorp Although things have moved on since when the PR looks to be exported dont forget that there are 2 set of <rk> out there. Re:http://www.mrgoodhost.com Shows as <rk> value of 3 on a non-big daddy dc:- http://72.14.207.104/search?client=navclient-auto&ch=6859727679&q=www.mrgoodhost.com and a <rk> of 5 on a big daddy dc:- http://64.233.179.104/search?client=navclient-auto&ch=6859727679&q=www.mrgoodhost.com So it looks accurate(ish) for me for that site. As I say things have moved on since PR seems to have been exported though. |
| |
(Threads which have no activity for more than 30 days are automatically closed.) |
| Quick Reply | ||
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Backlink checker | Chart Music | Discuss iWEBTOOL | 8 | 09-10-2006 10:09 PM |
| How accurate is the PR Checker? | jumpenjuhosaphat | Discuss iWEBTOOL | 13 | 09-10-2006 12:52 AM |
| PR checker against Google's TOS | Daniel Malone | General Talk | 6 | 06-21-2006 03:56 PM |
| Rank Checker /Multi-rate checker | Chart Music | Discuss iWEBTOOL | 4 | 05-30-2006 10:24 PM |
| Rank Checker /Multi-rate checker | Chart Music | Discuss iWEBTOOL | 0 | 05-22-2006 06:15 PM |